Review



finite element thermal evolution modeling  (COMSOL Inc)

 
  • Logo
  • About
  • News
  • Press Release
  • Team
  • Advisors
  • Partners
  • Contact
  • Bioz Stars
  • Bioz vStars
    • 90
      Buy from Supplier

    Structured Review

    COMSOL Inc finite element thermal evolution modeling
    ( A , C , and E ) The geometries and boundary conditions of COMSOL Multiphysics <t>finite</t> <t>element</t> <t>thermal</t> models for schematic cross sections of the crust and upper mantle in the region of the CE5 landing site. Compositions and thermal conductivities used for all models are shown in (A) and discussed in Materials and Methods. The upper KREEP layer represents Imbrium ejecta to the east of the CE5 landing site and begins generating heat at 3.9 Ga in all models. The lower KREEP layer has the composition of high-K KREEP . See Materials and Methods for more details on initial model conditions. ( B , D , and F ) Model results showing the temperature profiles of the crust and upper mantle at 2 Ga for each model. As these models are purely conductive and absolute temperatures are not necessarily applicable to the mantle, but rather these models show the relative heating effects of a subcrustal KREEP layer of either 5 km (D) or 10 km (F) thickness.
    Finite Element Thermal Evolution Modeling, supplied by COMSOL Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/finite element thermal evolution modeling/product/COMSOL Inc
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    finite element thermal evolution modeling - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
    90/100 stars

    Images

    1) Product Images from "A shallow mantle source for the Chang’e 5 lavas reveals how top-down heating prolonged lunar magmatism"

    Article Title: A shallow mantle source for the Chang’e 5 lavas reveals how top-down heating prolonged lunar magmatism

    Journal: Science Advances

    doi: 10.1126/sciadv.adr1486

    ( A , C , and E ) The geometries and boundary conditions of COMSOL Multiphysics finite element thermal models for schematic cross sections of the crust and upper mantle in the region of the CE5 landing site. Compositions and thermal conductivities used for all models are shown in (A) and discussed in Materials and Methods. The upper KREEP layer represents Imbrium ejecta to the east of the CE5 landing site and begins generating heat at 3.9 Ga in all models. The lower KREEP layer has the composition of high-K KREEP . See Materials and Methods for more details on initial model conditions. ( B , D , and F ) Model results showing the temperature profiles of the crust and upper mantle at 2 Ga for each model. As these models are purely conductive and absolute temperatures are not necessarily applicable to the mantle, but rather these models show the relative heating effects of a subcrustal KREEP layer of either 5 km (D) or 10 km (F) thickness.
    Figure Legend Snippet: ( A , C , and E ) The geometries and boundary conditions of COMSOL Multiphysics finite element thermal models for schematic cross sections of the crust and upper mantle in the region of the CE5 landing site. Compositions and thermal conductivities used for all models are shown in (A) and discussed in Materials and Methods. The upper KREEP layer represents Imbrium ejecta to the east of the CE5 landing site and begins generating heat at 3.9 Ga in all models. The lower KREEP layer has the composition of high-K KREEP . See Materials and Methods for more details on initial model conditions. ( B , D , and F ) Model results showing the temperature profiles of the crust and upper mantle at 2 Ga for each model. As these models are purely conductive and absolute temperatures are not necessarily applicable to the mantle, but rather these models show the relative heating effects of a subcrustal KREEP layer of either 5 km (D) or 10 km (F) thickness.

    Techniques Used:



    Similar Products

    finite element thermal evolution modeling  (COMSOL Inc)
    90
    COMSOL Inc finite element thermal evolution modeling
    ( A , C , and E ) The geometries and boundary conditions of COMSOL Multiphysics <t>finite</t> <t>element</t> <t>thermal</t> models for schematic cross sections of the crust and upper mantle in the region of the CE5 landing site. Compositions and thermal conductivities used for all models are shown in (A) and discussed in Materials and Methods. The upper KREEP layer represents Imbrium ejecta to the east of the CE5 landing site and begins generating heat at 3.9 Ga in all models. The lower KREEP layer has the composition of high-K KREEP . See Materials and Methods for more details on initial model conditions. ( B , D , and F ) Model results showing the temperature profiles of the crust and upper mantle at 2 Ga for each model. As these models are purely conductive and absolute temperatures are not necessarily applicable to the mantle, but rather these models show the relative heating effects of a subcrustal KREEP layer of either 5 km (D) or 10 km (F) thickness.
    Finite Element Thermal Evolution Modeling, supplied by COMSOL Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/finite element thermal evolution modeling/product/COMSOL Inc
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    finite element thermal evolution modeling - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
    90/100 stars
    		  Buy from Supplier

    Image Search Results


    ( A , C , and E ) The geometries and boundary conditions of COMSOL Multiphysics finite element thermal models for schematic cross sections of the crust and upper mantle in the region of the CE5 landing site. Compositions and thermal conductivities used for all models are shown in (A) and discussed in Materials and Methods. The upper KREEP layer represents Imbrium ejecta to the east of the CE5 landing site and begins generating heat at 3.9 Ga in all models. The lower KREEP layer has the composition of high-K KREEP . See Materials and Methods for more details on initial model conditions. ( B , D , and F ) Model results showing the temperature profiles of the crust and upper mantle at 2 Ga for each model. As these models are purely conductive and absolute temperatures are not necessarily applicable to the mantle, but rather these models show the relative heating effects of a subcrustal KREEP layer of either 5 km (D) or 10 km (F) thickness.

    Journal: Science Advances

    Article Title: A shallow mantle source for the Chang’e 5 lavas reveals how top-down heating prolonged lunar magmatism

    doi: 10.1126/sciadv.adr1486

    Figure Lengend Snippet: ( A , C , and E ) The geometries and boundary conditions of COMSOL Multiphysics finite element thermal models for schematic cross sections of the crust and upper mantle in the region of the CE5 landing site. Compositions and thermal conductivities used for all models are shown in (A) and discussed in Materials and Methods. The upper KREEP layer represents Imbrium ejecta to the east of the CE5 landing site and begins generating heat at 3.9 Ga in all models. The lower KREEP layer has the composition of high-K KREEP . See Materials and Methods for more details on initial model conditions. ( B , D , and F ) Model results showing the temperature profiles of the crust and upper mantle at 2 Ga for each model. As these models are purely conductive and absolute temperatures are not necessarily applicable to the mantle, but rather these models show the relative heating effects of a subcrustal KREEP layer of either 5 km (D) or 10 km (F) thickness.

    Article Snippet: To further investigate the thermal effects of a subcrustal KREEP-layer on a local scale and account for the regional geology of northern Oceanus Procellarum, we conducted finite element thermal evolution modeling using COMSOL Multiphysics (see Materials and Methods).

    Techniques: